9 steps to writing dialogue with rich subtext
16 Thursday May 2013
Written by Charles Harris in Dialogue
A writing friend asked the other day, how do you write dialogue with strong subtext. My first thought was to answer, “How don’t you?” For years, I’ve found writing subtext to be one of the most enjoyable parts of the process. But clearly he didn’t. He was having a problem.
He knew that subtext meant the thoughts that the character is not saying – the ideas that are being suggested, but not actually voiced directly, below (sub) the text. And he knew that it was essential that dialogue had subtext, but somehow he was struggling to write it. Could I help?
That made me stop and consider what I actually do instinctively when I’m writing dialogue and what lies behind what I do.
The subtext to writing subtext!
And I discovered there were nine steps to writing good dialogue with subtext.
1. Subtext is a muscle, like any other writing skill. You develop it by working it. At first it may seem hard but after putting in the hours you’ll find you start to develop an instinct. You’ll know when a line is “on the nose” and needs to be made more subtle and oblique. Be patient, work hard and the muscle will grow stronger.
2. First write the “text”. Talking to other writers, I found we all did the same. Our first drafts are full of dialogue that is unsubtle and too direct.
She starts to walk away.
MIKE
I don’t want you to go just yet.
CLAIRE
I can stay a little longer.
MIKE
Let’s talk.
Then when we redraft we take all those lines and find ways of hiding those thoughts by having our characters talk (overtly) of other things.
She starts to walk away.
MIKE
Claire?
CLAIRE
Hmm…
MIKE
(holds up crossword)
You wouldn’t happen to know what language they speak in India, do you?
(From Someone to Watch Over Me)
3. Listen to how real people talk. There’s nothing like a good dose of reality. Listen to the dialogue that people create naturally and ask yourself what they are really thinking. Then ask yourself how you know.
4. Read, read, read. Do some detective work. Spy on how the great novelists, short story writers, screenwriters and playwrights do it. Then steal as much as you can get away with.
5. Try this exercise. Create two random characters and give them something they mustn’t mention. Say, two prisoners are waiting to be hanged. They talk of anything but that – the weather, their last meal, a mouse in the cell. See how every word, every pause, can be filled with unspoken meaning.
6. Know your characters inside-out. One reason that it’s difficult to write subtext on the first draft is that you don’t yet know the characters well enough. Ibsen used to say, about writing plays, that in the first draft your characters are strangers. In the second draft they are friends, and by the third they are close family.
7. Practise, practise, practise. Keep a notebook with you always and jot down ideas for lines that come to you, lines that reveal without saying. When you’re waiting for a train or walking along the street, play with dialogue in your head. Keep exercising that muscle.
8. Cut, cut, cut.
Mary toys with her food. She looks up at Frank.
MARY
Do you love me?
FRANK
I have to admit that I don’t really love you very much.
MARY
That makes me feel very unhappy, but I’ll just have to get on with it, even though my heart is breaking.
It’s fascinating how much can be revealed by a question that is left hanging after you’ve cut the answer. Or an answer given to a question that’s not been asked. Find creative ways for your characters to change the subject, or the reverse: return to an old subject.
Mary toys with her food. She looks up at Frank.
MARY
Do you love me?
Frank says nothing but stares at his plate.
MARY
I’ll get the dessert, then. It’s trifle. Your favourite.
9. And finally, in writing as in real life, sometimes emotions are running so high that people do actually say what they are really thinking. They blurt out their love, their fear, their hope. But even then, there is almost always a subtext beneath their directness. Even as your character says, “I love you” there’s still something that’s not being said.
If you want to know more about this or other aspects of writing, you can post your question to me in the reply box below.
(I won’t be able to answer every question, or do it privately, but if you’re happy for me to post my answer online, go for it).
I go into much more detail in my book Complete Screenwriting Course where I can teach all these methods in full, help you work through practical exercises and examples.
Have fun.
38 Comments
Gianpiero said:
May 22, 2013 at 10:12 am
Hi Charles,
Thanks. Very useful. As an actor/writer who does a lot of work on subtext for both disciplines, can I suggest a Step 10 (or Step 0): Pay attention to your own subtext.
We don’t often realize, but it can be very useful to tap into, or “listen”, to our own “subtext” or “stream of consciousness”. It runs all day, every day. It can often provide insight into how humans think and talk and, sometimes more importantly, into our own psychology (by revealing to us what we’re thinking when we’re speaking, or not speaking).
gp
Charles Harris said:
May 22, 2013 at 3:53 pm
Hi Gianpiero
Thank you. I do like your Step 10 (or 0!). As a director (as well as writer) who’s worked extensively with actors, I find writing and acting to be very close indeed. You’re absolutely right: writers who tap into their stream of consciousness gain enormous insights. Perhaps this is indeed close to what writers used to call their Muse.
Maureen O'Danu said:
June 22, 2013 at 12:08 am
I’ve bookmarked this so I can use it as a reference. I’m plunging into fiction again after a long period where I’ve been running from writing as fast as I can. At some point I will probably write a ‘where to find information when you’re ready to write The Book’ article, and I would love to include a link to this article when I get read.
Charles Harris said:
July 4, 2013 at 4:38 pm
Thank you, Maureen. I wish you very well for the plunge. I know the feeling. Sometimes you get so tired running from writing it’s easier just to do the thing. And I’d be very happy for you to include a link.
celenagaia33 said:
August 18, 2013 at 11:41 am
Absolutely fantastic response. I’m more a concept writer, dialogue has always been a struggle. I’m definitely referring back to this.
Charles Harris said:
August 18, 2013 at 7:24 pm
Glad you liked it. Thinking about it, dialogue is almost exactly the opposite of concept writing – you have to hang loose, let go, be indirect and enjoy the texture and detail of it.
Having said that, an ability to be logical and to-the-point, which seems to go with writing concepts, will be an important asset when it comes to pruning it back afterwards. Good luck with your dialogue and have fun.
Charles
celenagaia33 said:
August 18, 2013 at 7:31 pm
An excellent response, one that gives me food for thought. Thank you 🙂
Rachael
Anthony said:
August 19, 2013 at 8:41 am
Dialogue of any description, including subtext, had always been my problem when it came to writing fiction. The story was fine, the plot more than adequate, but all the characters sounded like the Queen! I managed to get out of this by writing the story through dialogue first, then editing out all the superfluous chatter, replacing it with narrative and subtext.
Many thanks for this excellent advice.
Charles Harris said:
August 19, 2013 at 5:06 pm
Anthony, I like that approach. Though my mind boggles at the thought of every character sounding like Her Majesty! I think I need a lie down.
I find that really focusing on hearing each person in my head is crucial to getting their individual sound. I also like telling the story from each character’s point of view, using their own voice. It’s a variation on the method you’ve hit on, and it gives you a chance to see the story from different angles, and see things you might not have picked up on otherwise.
Charles
omnini said:
March 27, 2014 at 11:55 pm
I have a similar block..I am writing a book..plot..good..but the dialogue..basic..but needs expanding..thanks to this site..I have the idea..
Charles Harris said:
March 29, 2014 at 6:35 pm
I’m really pleased to have been of help. The very best of luck with the book.
Seb said:
December 24, 2014 at 1:35 pm
Hi Charles, really helpful article, thanks!
Quick question: does subtext exist only when the character is aware or conscious to some degree of what they feel or want? Or is there such a thing as “unconscious subtext”, where the reader/audience understands why the character says something different to what they feel, but the character is not aware of it? The latter would be an “unconscious” or underlying emotion (for example, a trauma that forces the character to avoid talking directly about something in order to avoid the pain that she unconsciously knows she would have to face if she dealt with it openly).
Charles Harris said:
January 5, 2015 at 12:23 pm
Hi Seb
Thank you – excellent question. Absolutely, there is such a thing as unconscious subtext, when a character reveals something about themselves that they aren’t aware of yet – or indeed may never become aware of. Freudian slips are a very blatant form of this, for example.
The new movie “Foxcatcher” is full of such subtext. There’s no doubt that Steve Carell’s character John du Pont has multiple psychological issues of which he is by no means aware. On a much lighter level, it’s common for romantic stories to begin with one or both romantic characters in conflict, but we sense there are hidden emotions that they have yet to realise are there.
At one point, in “When Harry Met Sally” Harry and Sally try to get each other together with two other people – of course we know they are in denial about their own feelings (and remain so for for a good part of the film).
LK Scott said:
March 13, 2015 at 5:10 pm
Are there genres where writing subtext is harder than other genres? I write murder mystery and horror, and I’ve found that my murder mystery characters have so many secrets that the subtext usually comes out on its own where as my horror feels a bit more flat.
Charles Harris said:
March 13, 2015 at 7:05 pm
Hi LK
This is a profound question. I do think that horror characters can have as many secrets as in other genres, but it’s easy to miss that, and probably depends on how the horror develops.
In many of the best stories, the horror arises from something that the protagonists have done in the past – not dealing respectfully with the dead, acting with hubris, or out of greed, pride, etc. See for example the movie “Poltergeist”. From the start of the film, the family are shown to be flawed – nice people but they’ve got issues. The very first shots make it clear that in some ways they live little better than animals, from moment to moment, with little thought for their place in the past or the future.
Even where they don’t have massive hidden secrets, however, there can be things people don’t say. Too often the sheer size of the horror that faces them means it’s easy to fall into the trap of writing “on the nose”. But there can be many reasons for characters to keep their real feelings hidden – maybe they don’t want to frighten others, they’re in denial, they have fixed beliefs about the cause of the horror that they won’t back down from, they’re trying to manipulate the situation to their own ends, etc.
When I’m writing a scene that I feel lacks subtext, one thing I do is ask myself what this person might be afraid of saying. And what they would say to avoid revealing it. Then move on from there.
What do you think?
Anonymous said:
March 4, 2016 at 12:52 pm
Maybe it is a bit late to respond to your commentary, but I think you should watch The Babadook for a great example of subtext in horror. The mother tries to keep hidden all her negative feelings about the son.
Charles Harris said:
March 4, 2016 at 6:48 pm
Hi LK
Thank you for your comment. It’s never too late! I’ve seen The Babadook and loved it (while hiding behind the sofa with my hands over my eyes, I have to say).
Having said that, I saw it well over a year ago on a screener, so you’ve made me get out the script and the DVD again.
Best wishes
Charles
A.J. Pardo said:
October 3, 2015 at 4:37 am
Thank you for sharing your expertise with us. I’ve always been an ‘idea’ guy, so writing all the dialogue in my first novel has been a bit of al challenge (albeit a rewarding one). I appreciate the help
Charles Harris said:
October 3, 2015 at 6:00 pm
Hi AJ
I’m delighted it helps. Tell me when your novel is out and I’ll help put the word around. C
Sera said:
January 18, 2016 at 7:21 am
In my screenplay, a young Colombian hit-lady tries to seduce the target she was contracted to kidnap. As he drops her off, she entices him to come up to her flat.
He circles the car and opens her door. He offers his hand. She holds it as she exits. Then she stands and faces him.
ROSITA
Every inch a gentleman, huh?
Nyumba smiles sheepishly and shakes his head.
NYUMBA
Don’t know inches. I grew up metric.
She looks into his eyes. Then she moves slightly closer. Then she speaks in a husky voice.
ROSITA
It’s cold out here. Would Mr. Metric Man care to come up for some hot … strong … dark … Colombian … coffee?
Is that good subtext?
Charles Harris said:
January 18, 2016 at 9:44 am
Hi Sera
Thank you for your question. It’s a good one. You’ve done well to find actions and dialogue that express what Rosita is trying to do as she gets out of the car. And I like Nyumba’s attempt to dodge the issue by pretending not to understand.
Her second line is rather less subtle, though. The husky voice and the invitation to coffee are rather cliché. It would be nice to see a fresh and less obvious approach. This would develop our interest in her character as someone with greater complexity and more inventiveness.
This is also a matter of audience involvement. If she’s so direct – and if he is so easily hooked – we lose respect for both characters, and therefore care less about happens.
Finally, I always ask myself how people would do things in real life (as opposed to the movies). This second line of hers feels more like a movie than real life. In reality, if she’s any good at her job, she’d be more careful about each step – wanting to avoid a commitment that could so easily be turned down.
This would also create a more interesting and involving dramatic moment for the audience.
In short, I feel this is a great start and I’d like to see you do even better in the next draft.
Best wishes
Charles
Anonymous said:
January 18, 2016 at 11:33 am
Thanks for the prompt reply, Charles.
I didn’t delve into what had happened so far. He is obviously attracted to her, something which is communicated before through his own voice over and the glances they exchange while in a club. Her brief is to get closer to him so that she can set up the kidnap that is to be carried out by her contractors.
So she is not being easy, but has to deflect his attention from an attractive female undercover Scotland Yard officer discreetly guarding him. You see, just like the hit-woman, the officer is masquerading as a student in his university class.
And by the way, you are right about his pretending not to understand her. Why? Because he is a lustful and naïve, but slightly shy, Prince from an oil rich kingdom who is on his first foreign trip.
.
Sera said:
January 18, 2016 at 2:34 pm
Thanks for the prompt reply, Charles,
Now, earlier in the screenplay, it is communicated that the Casanova Prince from an oil rich Kingdom is attracted to two of the women who are masquerading as students in his class.
One is Rosita, the hit-woman. Her strategy is to get close to him as she sets him up for a very public kidnapping. The other is Grace, an undercover female Scotland Yard officer who is charged with discreetly protecting the Prince and monitoring his movements.
Both women have been instructed to endear themselves to him and to ‘do anything to curry his favor and stay close to him if they are to please their respective masters.
All in all, I would like to thank you for the guidance. As you know, it’s a jungle out there.
Oh.. I hope this is not a spoiler, so I’ll whisper it to you:
The audience knows about the opposing kidnap and protection plans from the start, but they don’t know which of the students has been deployed by whom. Then there is the … Oops! I almost spoilt it!
Charles Harris said:
January 18, 2016 at 4:26 pm
Hi Sera – thank you for the clarifications.
I can see where you’re going with this. And I feel that a prince would be even more alert to honey-trap approaches, after all he’s probably had women trying to throw themselves at him for most of his adult life. So Rosita would need to be even cleverer. In my humble opinion.
It sets up a very interesting game of cat and mouse. Good luck developing the draft.
Charles
Christopher said:
October 13, 2017 at 7:35 am
I love it. Subtext gives depth to writing. Is there a way to avoid being too subtle? I like Gianpiero’s idea of listening to your own subtext but in my day to day dealings I often get blank stares and when I explain what I am trying to infer I am accused of being too subtle.
Charles Harris said:
October 13, 2017 at 4:02 pm
Hi Christopher – thank you. Yes, you can be too subtle as well as not subtle enough! Sometimes it’s OK if not everyone gets a particular point but at other times it’s crucial they do get it.
On such occasions, I aim to make important points more than once, in significantly different ways, with decreasing levels of subtlety. The first time will be caught by the cleverest readers/viewers. The second time, by the slightly slower ones, and the third time you hit the dim ones over the head with it!!
It helps you if you make each instance very different, eg: the first time you just show the table moving on its own in the background. The second time, you have someone say, “I think I’m going mad.” The third time, she shrieks, “There’s a poltergeist!”
If you do this well, the cleverer ones won’t mind, because they’ll feel so clever at having got it earlier than the others.
Mind you, if by “day to day dealings” you mean actually talking to people (as opposed to writing speech for actors) then that’s another matter…
Sarah said:
January 31, 2018 at 2:03 pm
Thanks for the post. Can you still incorporate subtext in something like an interrogation scene when one character has to be on the nose to ask the questions – that’s their job e.g. a police officer – but the other character doesn’t have the answers? I think subtext would be easier if the other character, for example, the suspect DID have the answers and wasn’t saying but is harder if the suspect is ‘innocent’? How can one introduce subtext here?
Charles Harris said:
January 31, 2018 at 6:37 pm
Hi Sarah
Thank you for this question – very interesting. Yes, absolutely you can find subtext in an interrogation – and must.
The interrogator will definitely have things that they aren’t saying. For example, they may feel insecure, or angry, but try to remain overtly in control and polite. They may feel they don’t have as much leverage as they’d like, or be trying to hide their growing frustration.
An innocent suspect will also have subtext, even if they are telling the truth, because there will always be things they aren’t saying. They may have other matters to hide, for example. Or they may have other issues that they’re concealing, such as (again) anger, insecurity, pride.
Did they know the victim and want to seem as if they had a better relationship than they did? Are they impatient to be finished and leave, but feel that to reveal this would make them look bad?
Or are they getting their rocks off by being “helpful” to the police, trying to conceal their excitement at being at the heart of a big investigation…. I’m sure you can think of more, and better, ideas.
Tell me how you get on.
Best wishes
Charles
Kourosh Naziri said:
February 4, 2021 at 3:01 am
I am so thankful that I found your blog. I found this very useful in my book writing. An expert writer is an amateur who didn’t stop. I trust myself that a decent writer doesn’t actually should be advised anything but to keep at it. Keep it up!
Charles Harris said:
February 4, 2021 at 4:29 pm
Hi Kourosh
I’m pleased you found it useful. I totally agree – the only sin is stopping (well, there are other sins, but they’re for another time). Sometimes, though, we all need advice in some areas!
Very best
Charles
Monique said:
March 17, 2021 at 11:50 pm
You’ve done a fantastic job. I’ll certainly digg it and personally. If the book is valid, it will discover a crowd of people that is intended to understand it. An author is somebody for whom composing is more troublesome than it is for others. Cheers!
Charles Harris said:
March 18, 2021 at 5:13 pm
Hi Monique – thank you. And I agree totally with that last sentence. Why do we find it so troublesome? I wish I knew. Every time I set out thinking it’s going to be easy this time…. If only.
Charles Harris said:
May 15, 2020 at 5:53 pm
Hi Alex
Thank you for linking to my article. I’m delighted you liked it.
Very best
Charles Harris